From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 26 20:57:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438D716A41C; Thu, 26 May 2005 20:57:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E733443D1F; Thu, 26 May 2005 20:57:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4QKvOdR088584; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:57:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4QKvO3a088583; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:57:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:57:23 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20050526205723.GA88546@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200505162031.j4GKVMOR038312@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050521.144236.74702484.chat95@mac.com> <20050523023831.GC62971@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, NAKATA Maho , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc40 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:57:28 -0000 On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:30:14PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2005, David O'Brien wrote: > >> However, I think we should see to use one of the regular ports in the > >> future instead of having a special port just for the purpose of building > >> OpenOffice.org. > > At the moment gcc-ooo has some needed patches that were rejected for GCC > > 3.4. So we have no choice - unless we add the patches to the gcc34 port. > > I investigated doing that, but I wasn't comfortable with the changes the > > patches make to add them to gcc34 for general use. > > Yes, in that case we shouldn't do that. However, I wonder whether it's > really necessary to keep gcc-ooo as a port of its own instead of making > it a child port of the main gcc34 port which carries additional patches? I thought about that, but ... > Alternatively, how about giving the gcc40 port a try? I see the value in having a GCC port that is exactly what the OpenOffice.org developer team uses. OOo is such a demanding application I didn't want to add any road blocks to the FreeBSD OOo port maintainer. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)