From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep 18 16:20:53 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA08764
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 16:20:53 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA08757
          ; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 16:20:48 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.34]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA18934; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 16:19:28 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id QAA03724; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 16:21:48 -0700
Message-Id: <199509182321.QAA03724@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de, julian@freefall.freebsd.org,
        hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: why is this not a bug in namei? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Sep 95 14:11:06 PDT."
             <199509182111.OAA08650@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 16:21:46 -0700
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Is this just a typo? Shouldn't it be a FREE() macro like below?
...
>The code should still be cleaned up, however.
>
>I prefer the macroized version to allow later instrumentation.

   I prefer the non macroized version. The instrumentation of malloc/free
belongs in malloc() & free(). Macros are ugly and usually evil. They
unnecessarily obscure the code.

-DG