From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 14 21:26:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705C016A402; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2543B13C467; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 6BCAE1F707E; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:26:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (nox@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6ELOxCq049955; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:24:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l6ELOwk9049954; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:24:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:24:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <200707142124.l6ELOwk9049954@saturn.kn-bremen.de> To: craig@yekse.gank.org X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.ports In-Reply-To: <20070714181125.GA54021@nowhere> References: <20070702203027.GA45302@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <46925324.9010908@freebsd.org> <3bbf2fe10707091140h6cdc7469nac5be03a8c8a60cb@mail.gmail.com> <200707092000.29768.dfr@rabson.org> <200707092149.l69LnXe9023835@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20070712175252.GA77654@nowhere> <20070712180750.GB77654@nowhere> <20070713204604.GA14827@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Organization: home Cc: attilio@freebsd.org, Allan Jude , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:26:08 -0000 In article <20070714181125.GA54021@nowhere> you write: >On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:46:04PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: >> Okay what do you guys think about the following patch for now: >> (the SMP thing might actually be the cause for ports/113430, can >> someone verify?) > >I wonder if perhaps the port should be marked NO_PACKAGE, since quite a >bit depends on kernel parameters that may be different on the build >machine. Actually it originally had NO_PACKAGE because of this (and the fact that kqemu wasn't opensource back then), but kris changed that to RESTRICTED in order to enable pointyhat builds. Do other kld ports still have NO_PACKAGE? I agree that using packages for klds usually is a bad idea, maybe we need a new variable that only allows packaging for pointyhat in order to test compilation... > >Or at least a big scary warning in pkg-message that it will probably >crash if you install from a package and have a non-GENERIC kernel. ...or the package is older than your kernel (especially on -current), yeah thats a good idea (which I just committed.) Thanx, Juergen