From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 12 21:44:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAB61065673; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz) Received: from relay.felk.cvut.cz (relay.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.80.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1850B8FC17; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sci.felk.cvut.cz (sci.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.83.100]) by relay.felk.cvut.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6CLi5W0093602; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:44:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:53:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Petr Salinger X-X-Sender: salinger@sci.felk.cvut.cz To: Robert Millan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20110711150614.GV43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110711154102.GW43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110711172408.GX43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110711180246.GA43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110712103526.GF43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110712204337.GJ43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-FELK-MailScanner-Information: X-MailScanner-ID: p6CLi5W0093602 X-FELK-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FELK-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.119, required 6, AWL 0.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, FREEMAIL_FROM 0.00, SPF_NEUTRAL 0.78) X-FELK-MailScanner-From: petr.salinger@seznam.cz X-FELK-MailScanner-To: current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, kostikbel@gmail.com, rmh@debian.org X-FELK-MailScanner-Watermark: 1311111846.61093@TuNctzhbfAQ3xyu/Wv33mw X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Kostik Belousov , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:44:25 -0000 >> I will bump revision for stable/8 when merging, but I do not see much >> reason to bump on HEAD right now. Many thanks. > Uhm I think we can survive without a bump in HEAD. For now we will > need to keep our backward-compatibility patch anyway, and when the > bump happens on stable/8 our sysctl comparison will identify 900039 as > new ABI. We cannot survive without a bump in HEAD before 9.0 release, but we do not need bump immediately. So far the condition for new API will be if ( (osreldate >= 900040) || ((osreldate >= 803000) && (osreldate < 900000))) Of course, when MFC will bump revision, the 803000 constant will change (probably to 802509). Petr