Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:15:06 +0100
From:      Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch>
To:        "Dustin Puryear" <dpuryear@usa.net>
Cc:        isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re[10]: Using DNAT and DNS round-robin
Message-ID:  <107624744755.20011211191506@buz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <PGECILGGNJGDPJKLFEMIEEBACJAA.dpuryear@usa.net>
References:  <PGECILGGNJGDPJKLFEMIEEBACJAA.dpuryear@usa.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hello Dustin,

Tuesday, December 11, 2001, 6:29:35 PM, you wrote:
> Yes, that is what I eventually found out. Apparently, unless you
> have some type of special gear, you cannot do IP-based virtual
> hosting in a
> load-sharing or -balancing environment. Now, doing HA might not be
> too much work depending on what your requirements for switch over
> time are.  

<10s is doable with standard gear. <1s is quite a bit harder but
perhaps still doable.

>> That's nice. I wished I were in the same situation...
> Yes, it is nice. I have yet to do work for a company providing web
> hosting to consumers, but I can see how it would have some real
> challenges. But it  

It certainly has.

> synchronization issue. NAS being one. A second is using a few
> "shell" servers that automatically get replicated to your web
> servers seems to be another.

I've been thinking about that approach too, but it doesn't buy you
much since there are still that morons that use the FS as DB...

>> Squid should do the job too, more flexibly, but probably slower.
> I played with Squid and it works nicely. Indeed, I liked the fact
> that with Squid I can make my web cluster disappear from outsiders
> and use Squid as a reverse proxy. However, since we dropped the
> requirement for IP-based virtual hosting the point is moot. We will
> be using just a standard configuration where we will DNS
> round-robin between web servers.

That's the easiest approach, of course. OTOH, I haven't got a very
high opinion of DNS round robin since it essentially still lets the
remote client fuck it up...




Best regards,
 Gabriel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQEVAwUBPBY/HcZa2WpymlDxAQFoUQgAuCZrFy8u5EILeyiLBgjtLuRVcLhX8ItT
3LfKOnw2ve513rx4F6gT9nVNrapH4jWYtidrBla4Z8xtH3N6Yem9r53To6xCqYpd
GMxv8RZdxuZtXCV92CnDxeKGIZ89nPBPFAsC6sQkDPX3jThf9+t6jI59J9rroqq+
rwP63//vR8Pq63//Q7Lc7/TgAE6jJHs0nAXadiq1mUSwFZVF+nUgPYU3BnN9iyud
7CLLxYnArXguGZRx2wfdskPiZ7ZCSl5mC78kUimTDHLXrV2VofyzjIJWBcWyMzNA
d9fo9b9OtDKRj3Hnvj5MpDjJySaxDBsyY15NaecYlAVazQIWuRMUyQ==
=5dpk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?107624744755.20011211191506>