From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 20:17:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0591C106567B for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:17:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDA28FC17 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from vampire.homelinux.org (dslb-088-066-001-120.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.66.1.120]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML25U-1KQ6V71jpP-0000w0; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:17:53 +0200 Received: (qmail 67066 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2008 20:17:53 -0000 Received: from fbsd8.laiers.local (192.168.4.151) by router.laiers.local with SMTP; 4 Aug 2008 20:17:53 -0000 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Beech Rintoul Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:17:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.52 (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.0.83; i386; ; ) References: <200808041127.25511.beech@freebsd.org> <200808042130.26025.max@love2party.net> <200808041137.51687.beech@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200808041137.51687.beech@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808042217.52974.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+BODqXU6woQenA510zX8NLqSlPitKwHi/beeq oez++kz08y/pabo0lX6U3cuhunRI0hUOajWghO+iPl4BZnGFms MOtJ9B+J5AitB8hP6KUeg== Cc: Subject: Re: IPFilter build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:17:55 -0000 On Monday 04 August 2008 21:37:47 Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Monday 04 August 2008, Max Laier said: > > > Anyone have a clue how to fix this? > > > > Please test the attached ... sent it to a similar report in cvs@ a > > few days back, but did not get any feedback. Are you using > > WITHOUT_DYNAMICROOT? > > No, thanks for the quick reply. I'll give this a shot and let you know > how it works. No no dynamic root? Okay, any idea what else might be different from the tinderbox (which doesn't seem to pick this up)? Would be helpful to figure out where this is coming from (other than the #ifdef nightmare in the ipfilter sources, of course). -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News