From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 17:52:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A40FBB33D0 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1964C1691 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u78HqJ9E074372 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:52:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211361] suggested boot partition size is too small, bsdinstall creates unaligned partitions Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:52:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:52:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211361 --- Comment #15 from Nathan Whitehorn --- (In reply to Dag-Erling Sm=C3=83=C2=B8rgrav from comment #14) gpart(8) does know about those things and will align to stripesize -- the l= ogic in the installer is copied from the userland code in geom_part.c. And the installer doesn't know about CHS. The stripe size, in geom, is the canonical mechanism for recommending IO alignment. Why do we want to break that? The only partitioning policy choices the installer makes are those involved= in making the system bootable on the given platform (where the bootloader goes= , in particular, and which partition schemes are bootable). It tries *very* hard= not to do anything else and, in particular, not to second guess defaults. I wou= ld like to keep it that way. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=