From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 20:26:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5818106566B for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas-2-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:b9c::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E198FC16 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6MKQZaQ057156; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:26:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6MKQZ3B057155; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:26:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:26:35 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: Mike Tancsa Message-ID: <20110722202635.GA57111@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <4D301C9702145855@> <20110721141011.GB47190@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <4D7F86D5017EB3D8@> <20110721151210.GA47663@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <4D301C9702253683@> <4E29BC1F.6060103@sentex.net> <20110722190821.GA55040@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <4E29D37E.8070908@sentex.net> <20110722201034.GA56830@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <4E29DA4F.9010006@sentex.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E29DA4F.9010006@sentex.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:26:36 -0000 On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:15:11PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > > > > > 3.65 419155.4 > > Thats 400Mb/s no ? Whats the CPU in this thing ? Also your NIC version > was 7.1.9. RELENG_8 has 7.2.3. Can you try that version if possible ? I sit corrected, decimal point error. My apologies, long day here. For the CPU, 400Mbs isn't bad. CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 420 @ 1.60GHz (1600.01-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10661 Family = 6 Model = 16 Stepping = 1 Features=0xafebfbff Features2=0xe31d AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x1 TSC: P-state invariant My ~30MB/s from applications is roughly 240Mb/s. Will applications such as NFS cut bandwith usage that much? I'll try the newer driver. > > So no, I'm not saturating this network. Not even close. I have a > > machine with a 100Mbs vr0 that can spit out twice that much. > > How could FastE nics do 800Mb/s ? Same decimal point error. It's clearly time for me go home. Thanks, ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Latest book: Network Flow Analysis http://www.networkflowanalysis.com/ mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org, Twitter @mwlauthor