From owner-cvs-all  Mon May  4 03:45:12 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA00378
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 03:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns11.rim.or.jp (root@ns11.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.230])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA00346;
          Mon, 4 May 1998 03:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp)
Received: from rayearth.rim.or.jp (rayearth.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.242]) by ns11.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-ns11/RIMNET-2) with ESMTP
	id TAA21367; Mon, 4 May 1998 19:45:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by rayearth.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-uucp1/RIMNET) with UUCP
	id TAA02913; Mon, 4 May 1998 19:45:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aslm.rim.or.jp (8.8.8/3.5Wpl3-SMTP) with ESMTP id TAA16403; Mon, 4 May 1998 19:39:52 +0900 (JST)
To: eivind@yes.no
Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, mph@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: max@wide.ad.jp
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources
From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 4 May 1998 00:33:56 +0200"
	<19980504003356.43232@follo.net>
References: <19980504003356.43232@follo.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.92.4 on Emacs 20.2 / Mule 3.0 (MOMIJINOGA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <19980504193952S.masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp>
Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 19:39:52 +0900
X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024
Lines: 20
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

     > The question is how far we should go in setting policy - and I
     > believe that encouraging people to block advertisments on the
     > web is clearly destructive, and contrary to our purposes
     > (limiting the use of the web for advertising for FreeBSD).  I
     > won't say that we shouldn't have ijb in the ports collection,
     > but I don't think we should have it with a description
     > encouraging people to 'pirate websites' - ie, browse without
     > giving the site their advertising displays.

I believe including some ports in our collection does not mean we are
encouraging people to use them.  It just means that they have an
option to use them.  And what's wrong with including true fact in the
description?  And as I see the COMMENT and the DESCR files, they are
not encouraging anyone to do anything, they are just stating what the
port is for.  And of course, it is totally up to each user how the
program is going to be used after installation.

     Cheers,
Max


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message