From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 20:26:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8467016A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B73A43FEA for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:26:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drhodus@catpa.com) Received: from catpa.com ([68.209.168.6]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031127042641.DIBV1942.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@catpa.com>; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:26:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3FC57CF6.7040805@catpa.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:26:30 -0500 From: David Rhodus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Sommers References: <20031126183744.GA9140@merlin.emma.line.org> <20031127044934.K26615@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> <20031126190344.GA34173@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <20031127040819.9774.qmail@neuroflux.com> In-Reply-To: <20031127040819.9774.qmail@neuroflux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Leo Bicknell cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-BETA: giving up on 4 buffers (ata) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 04:26:43 -0000 Ryan Sommers wrote: >> >> I'll also note in my FreeBSD current debugging of some drivers it was >> about a 50/50 shot as to if this would happen. Having to fsck every >> other reboot was only made less painful by the background fsck thing. > > > Don't some BIOS' protect the superblocks as a kind of "virus > protection"? Could this be related to them? No. -DR