From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 27 18:12:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA08109 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:12:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from oldnews.quick.net ([207.212.170.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA08103 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:12:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from donegan@oldnews.quick.net) Received: (from donegan@localhost) by oldnews.quick.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) id SAA16812; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:11:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 18:11:45 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven P. Donegan" To: Mike Smith cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Greg Lehey , FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: Thanks, Core Team In-Reply-To: <199812280201.SAA06590@dingo.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Steven P. Donegan wrote: > > > > > > > > I read every email on this forum - the above statement is BS. > > > > Sorry to be short - my point was I have seen no discussion on committing > > this (major) change - some comments pro/con yes - doing it no. > > That makes more sense; I was going to point out that we've been > actively discussing the migration for months. The suddenness of the > cutover was indeed alarming, but all that was really missing was a > HEADS UP. > Sorry to be a bother - but I believe quite a few folks had negative comments on this transition, some still outstanding/unanswered. To me personally this will be a non-event, but to those folks it may be a problem. The only point I was making was that it was a significant change that didn't seem to have been talked out. No problem - I'll drop back to lurker mode and shut up now. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message