From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 03:06:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F9B1065686 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdh_lists@yahoo.com) Received: from web56806.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56806.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BA378FC28 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdh_lists@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 65306 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Oct 2008 03:06:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=UvYdc3Ig5RtjsCk1Vgk0xC8zDPOJplrAS0IO/KZlwGZeTJZ06mhvuhZiSI2T/mGX/dPXGCqfJAj/L8BKGRqsBi7Ruxy8Zaptx22ygcMbSzu/GBSFzIsBPx5DOIBclzUomwaHL+wQDwIb3qbGa6Z892DGbeF4MVJouCImNIcfX4M=; X-YMail-OSG: 9H8L6EAVM1naHGuurQT_BWEYkMjOKfg5uhfSrmzN77FvIDO8FOp3_Qq80z1FZjjhkV067fVChUmEBsHHaC6ksVhKN77AWUKmBS6v793a7G4._f5mJBBV8l5KbNKixC_LQeENa7peaw4_CyC2JVeYRVdmu5RJJg0sVjOoolfiVhDSpVyRsdz_HyE0ipuS8w-- Received: from [71.61.220.126] by web56806.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:06:01 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2 Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:06:01 -0700 (PDT) From: mdh To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <48EEA4B3.3050707@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <958963.64003.qm@web56806.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: uptime 2 years! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mdh_lists@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:06:02 -0000 --- On Thu, 10/9/08, Eitan Adler wrote: > From: Eitan Adler > Subject: Re: uptime 2 years! > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 8:41 PM > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > [snip] > > And in theory it should be possible to change time_t > to unsigned, and > > get another two-thirds of a century out of it... > > > However this would break binary compatibility with anything > compiled > before the change. One thing to consider is that changing any signed value to an unsigned value then prevents functions which return that type from returning -1 (or otherwise <0) to indicate an error condition. Even if it doesn't affect anything at all in the base system, it could impact untold sums of software developed not in the base system. - mdh