From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 7 20:14:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298002E8; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0A914EF; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 45E841E00219; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:13:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from enceladus10.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by enceladus10.kn-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s17KC9JO060002; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:12:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox@enceladus10.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by enceladus10.kn-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id s17KC9IT060001; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:12:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:12:08 +0100 To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: linux libusb again, I made an updated port... Message-ID: <20140207201208.GA59695@enceladus10.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "Wojciech A. Koszek" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:14:00 -0000 Hi! This came up on irc so I tried to build a linux libusb port (before I learned about ports/146895), mine uses linux_base-gentoo-stage3 like linux_kdump with a src/lib/libusb head snapshot so it's more up to date than wkoszek's build (ports/146895), and it's really easy to update it again. Also maybe it can be used as linux libusb-1.0.so too; I didn't actually test it tho. Should this be committed? Is wkoszek's version better since it also builds on < 10.x? Comments welcome... wkoszek's version: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146895 Mine: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/linux_libusb.shar Distfile: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/distfiles/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.tar.bz2 10/amd64 package: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/packages/10amd64/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.txz (built via: poudriere bulk -v -j 10amd64 -p custom devel/linux_libusb - btw for some reason the dependency emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 doesn't build for 10i386 in poudriere bulk, I get a pkg segfault. bapt Cc'd...) Thanx, Juergen