From owner-freebsd-commit  Sat Jul 15 07:21:18 1995
Return-Path: commit-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA27123
          for commit-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 07:21:18 -0700
Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA27117
          for <freebsd-commit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 07:21:10 -0700
Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id HAA04666 for freebsd-commit@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 07:20:57 -0700
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Message-Id: <199507151420.HAA04666@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Subject: Well... is this a bug or a feature???
To: freebsd-commit@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 958       
Sender: commit-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

This is what my new branch stuff does if you are doing 
tree commits.  Technically it is accurate, and technically
one could have had ping on one branch and dump on another,
but some how I just doubt that would be very smart.

I'll look at cleaning this up, but for now it is a lot better
than what we had..


Forwarded message:
> From rgrimes Sat Jul 15 07:15:50 1995
> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 07:15:49 -0700
> From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes>
> Message-Id: <199507151415.HAA04595@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
> To: CVS-commiters, cvs-sbin
> Subject: cvs commit: src/sbin/ping ping.8
> 
> rgrimes     95/07/15 07:15:49
> 
>   Branch:      sbin/dump  RELENG_2_1_0
>                sbin/ping  RELENG_2_1_0
>   Modified:    sbin/dump  dump.8
>                sbin/ping  ping.8
>   Log:
>   Just a small test!
> 


-- 
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company                 Reliable computers for FreeBSD