From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 14:47:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E44716A4CE for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:47:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C40743D45 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:47:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CaEiS-00084b-00; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:47:24 +0100 Received: from [217.83.2.51] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CaEiS-0006HE-00; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:47:24 +0100 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:48:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <00ea01c4d89f$273c9d20$2603fb93@KLOBOUCEK> In-Reply-To: <00ea01c4d89f$273c9d20$2603fb93@KLOBOUCEK> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6298269.uz0DLbLyzS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412031548.02444.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 cc: Petr Holub Subject: Re: pf and bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:47:26 -0000 --nextPart6298269.uz0DLbLyzS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 02 December 2004 19:45, Petr Holub wrote: > Hi all, > > I wonder if it is possible to use the new pf firewall together with > bridging as it is possible to use it with ipf and ipfw. Unfortunately the PFIL_HOOKS in bridge.c don't work too well for pf (or ipf= =20 for the same reason) thus you cannot use stateful filtering. There is an=20 ongoing discussion on freebsd-pf@ that talks about the details: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2004-December/000621.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2004-December/000625.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2004-December/000631.html =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart6298269.uz0DLbLyzS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBsHyiXyyEoT62BG0RAqVaAJ4xEdKCqI8KLH+HYK6i49gSTbM/2QCdEUd0 ClWw1Fc3rt4M3oEl/144xpE= =2XIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6298269.uz0DLbLyzS--