From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 3 14:34:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CD21065679 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 14:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@msen.com) Received: from shell.msen.com (msen.com [148.59.86.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45BD8FC17 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 14:34:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Sent-To: Received: from [192.168.1.108] (c-68-40-255-141.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.255.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell.msen.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p43EMmJ7009936 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 10:22:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mark@msen.com) Message-ID: <4DC00FB5.7080306@msen.com> Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:22:45 -0400 From: Mark Moellering User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=msen.com; client-ip=68.40.255.141; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=msen.com; client-ip=68.40.255.141; helo=[192.168.1.108] X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: shell.msen.com; Sender-ip: 68.40.255.141; Sender-helo: [192.168.1.108]; ) Subject: OT: Security question (openssl vs openssh) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 14:34:16 -0000 Everyone, I am looking into setting up a webserver to hold some very sensitive information. I am trying to figure out which is more secure, forcing any web connections to be done using an ssh tunnel or forcing ssl. I have not been able to figure out if one is definitively much more secure than another or if they are close to the same. I would have initially thought the ssh tunnel was more secure but knowing that ssl can use AES-256, I am now wondering if that isn't adding a complexity for little extra security. Thanks in advance Mark Moellering