From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 12 11:27:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA26168 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA26163 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA11691 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199705121827.LAA11691@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project: editor In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 May 1997 09:40:16 PDT." <337747F0.56BF@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 11:27:30 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Thats a different story and we should upgrade our tcl . A few interesting things are happening at Sun -- webtk , a tk based web server, etc... Tnks, Amancio >From The Desk Of "Pedro F. Giffuni" : > Michael Smith wrote: > > > > This is the "I don't like Tcl" reflex. It's like the gag reflex; once > > you recognise it, it's easy to deal with. > > > I don't have anything against Tcl, but it keeps getting in the way when > I need iTcl or another Tcl version. I hate it because it's in the base > distribution, not because it's Tcl 8-). > > Pedro > > > > > -- > > ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ > > ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ > > ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ > > ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ > > ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[ >