From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun  9 06:55:06 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35841065672
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  9 Jun 2012 06:55:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com)
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.214.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993E08FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  9 Jun 2012 06:55:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so4494180obc.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 08 Jun 2012 23:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=8QEcDPq0VUukrPzoeAgoSc3z4S5Ngs1OKsbo3jJbcNQ=;
	b=UUn6ntIAwzFSptiFbKuJrw++/wIlcLPUXdzlK0Jw50ztoiGd/KDQJVE3Z3Ln21fb8a
	5e4RRtuU5OWYqYbMK0g6Ck+9gQa++QEWOpPV+9r/X5vfGoD0D0atodY38/WBI55Oh6OF
	9D920KLKjoqCcKkOZuee0axs5PDRTsBAGpy3A=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=8QEcDPq0VUukrPzoeAgoSc3z4S5Ngs1OKsbo3jJbcNQ=;
	b=lMTPU236oj3gJc5gYiHe8Jgci+/Ojaz/Ybf9gLXK5MbwE7QkbWPHQsYpOorQesvj3B
	NMb+OQD6D8eCMz37RV2vS3nMXyneNIjJE8QwxAhwYhJgJqUyTroiOvEFuY2FzsGrgJ7t
	UVhabfp/QnR/K203Qav7Z7QmI+hTPSA8n59PFohUSerK29NpbSlYydj90sCxTwWdT8Sm
	JaPLyXAYFnTjrM1YaUoIuzMbk3/IKJVQeqFu+nCQm8XVTwt1PKtOF/QURiSVc6DSHrkQ
	CUdAIW7nxjdGaH54U2G1Vd1TFV+UAodaaBoYwfQLkkV9yuiKq5brayvk1Ko0uX7SHOhi
	YSvQ==
Received: by 10.182.187.42 with SMTP id fp10mr9839706obc.30.1339224905969;
	Fri, 08 Jun 2012 23:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.204.69 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 23:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120609082134.42a36d30.freebsd@edvax.de>
References: <4FD2E7EF.1060208@dreamchaser.org>
	<20120609082134.42a36d30.freebsd@edvax.de>
From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 23:54:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkmWr=4UFHuHJLmc=MQj8O8WOidwEmek9=C_X_0z_HfCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmMVbeFwtdIN/OZpTHrslZeHmoccADSA7JdGtSuWP0Wx5T59aCcU1DAXFW5GPgfiVQWw0dU
Cc: freebsd@dreamchaser.org,
	FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: prune ports tree?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 06:55:07 -0000

On 8 June 2012 23:21, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:06:39 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
> This approach does _not_ work well when using portsnap. From
> the portsnap.conf manpage: "Note that operating with an incomplete
> ports tree is not supported and may cause unexpected results."

Note that the issue of incomplete ports trees has nothing to do with
portsnap - it is unsupported no matter how you obtain ports.

-- 
Eitan Adler