Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 23:54:35 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: freebsd@dreamchaser.org, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: prune ports tree? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkmWr=4UFHuHJLmc=MQj8O8WOidwEmek9=C_X_0z_HfCA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120609082134.42a36d30.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4FD2E7EF.1060208@dreamchaser.org> <20120609082134.42a36d30.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 June 2012 23:21, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:06:39 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote: >> Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used? > This approach does _not_ work well when using portsnap. From > the portsnap.conf manpage: "Note that operating with an incomplete > ports tree is not supported and may cause unexpected results." Note that the issue of incomplete ports trees has nothing to do with portsnap - it is unsupported no matter how you obtain ports. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkmWr=4UFHuHJLmc=MQj8O8WOidwEmek9=C_X_0z_HfCA>