From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 9 12:37:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ece.cmu.edu (ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.136.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564B837B41F for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hilfy.ece.cmu.edu (HILFY.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.136.133]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g39Jaow25802; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 15:36:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Problems with ifhp and phaser740 From: "Brandon S. Allbery" To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Fritz Heinrichmeyer , freebsd-stable In-Reply-To: <20020409183913.200B55D04@ptavv.es.net> References: <20020409183913.200B55D04@ptavv.es.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 09 Apr 2002 15:36:46 -0400 Message-Id: <1018381006.23409.4.camel@hilfy.ece.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 14:39, Kevin Oberman wrote: > If I get a bit of free time I will submit port updates for this. The > author was sending in updates, but not to gnats, so I suspect they > have been totally ignored. No, they weren't; he got roasted for breaking a bunch of ports rules and told to resubmit after fixing. I didn't notice if he ever did resubmit (-ports gets way too much traffic for me to keep up with...). (One which I didn't see a complaint about but which I tripped over: neither sysutils/LPRng nor print/ifhp is LOCALBASE-clean.) -- brandon s. allbery [linux][solaris][japh][freebsd] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [openafs][heimdal][too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message