From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Apr 6 11:02:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A22D31DE4; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4360DADB; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 6A0352E73; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:02:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Matthew Rezny , FreeBSD Current , Dimitry Andric , FreeBSD PowerPC ML , FreeBSD Toolchain , FreeBSD Ports , Johannes M Dieterich , Mark Millard Subject: Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example) Message-ID: <20170406110203.GA83987@FreeBSD.org> References: <3EDEF0B7-59C5-4648-9737-6682E18645BC@dsl-only.net> <7F94CE59-D2CC-4D6F-B1CD-FF3D1F8EDCE7@FreeBSD.org> <20170330170648.GA38004@FreeBSD.org> <2502554.oHoOYGyFJH@workstation.reztek> <20170405161541.GA32323@FreeBSD.org> <55bf3ea7-c601-ba55-822a-5b28cbca109f@FreeBSD.org> <20170405172054.GB32323@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:02:04 -0000 On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 08:46:22PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 05/04/2017 ?? 19:20, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit : > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Le 05/04/2017 ?? 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit : > >>> ... > >>> That 1G looks like a big jump from 259M of llvm39-3.9.1_1.txz to me. > >> > >> So, you are comparing the size of the llvm39 package with the size of > >> the llvm40 after extraction ? > > > > Ha, didn't realize it, I'm so dumb. What [is] the size of llvm40-*.txz > > then? I don't have it cached locally yet... > > On my builds: > > -rw-r--r-- 6 nobody wheel 256105968 4 avr. 17:54 llvm39-3.9.1_4.txz > -rw-r--r-- 6 nobody wheel 304951340 4 avr. 18:02 llvm40-4.0.0_2.txz Thanks, now it all makes sense, sorry for confusion. ./danfe