From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Nov 20 19:37:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA01899 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 19:37:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from dyson.iquest.net ([198.70.144.127]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA01891 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 19:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.2/8.6.9) id WAA02859; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 22:36:12 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199611210336.WAA02859@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: vm_page_alloc(ZERO): missing pages... To: peter@spinner.dialix.com (Peter Wemm) Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 22:36:11 -0500 (EST) Cc: smp@csn.net, ccsanady@friley216.res.iastate.edu, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199611210321.LAA19697@spinner.DIALix.COM> from "Peter Wemm" at Nov 21, 96 11:21:10 am Reply-To: dyson@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > "John S. Dyson" wrote: > > > > > > if it happens with only 1 processor running I would think it rules out the > tlb > > > theory... > > > > > Is the SMP code totally sync'ed with -current? There was a severe problem > > in earlier versions (and could have manifest the problem that you > > describe.) vm_page.c had the problem. > > > > John > > I agree - it is looking much more like the VM problem.. The smp code has > not recently been sync'ed with -current (like: 6-8 weeks ago), I'm in the > middle of that right at the moment.. > BTW, I now have an SMP capable P6 MB (SuperMicro P6DNF) with only one processor (so far.) I do have some filesystem, etc agendas in the offing, but hope (soon) to be able to help/test the SMP code. I know that my efforts are best spent where I am most knowledgable, but do want to sync up and help with the fine grained effort (whatever that might be) in the future. (I certainly am not expert in SMP enough to architect the SMP code -- you all seem to be doing really well, but am willing to help (participate) in implementation of you all's good ideas :-)). John