From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 3 17:36:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD1C106566B for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:36:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33F88FC17 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhfq46 with SMTP id q46so11084149yhf.13 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:36:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hZ8+UjUqryoqIOpWXGSYuk94XCDjupFmvumEPVNKHsU=; b=MY86K7alU8SvFGRqRzjmKQtbdSHQQYG9ld4LjJ4WJuOabprdtFbO9JFkiB2N6T5wvZ 3a67jDMaL39610aDAqHtgydyOv6V0tzjz2Bci8Msgp9nUZw+9rFwB2Wkzj+t342WIWMz KnGvE5EQMNimSbYJI8HRZPmJWLkyUMyZ+76rY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.183.138 with SMTP id q10mr66841823yhm.128.1325610453782; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:07:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.76.13 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:07:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:07:33 -0200 Message-ID: From: Alexandre Biancalana To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: FreeBSD at Amazon EC2 status X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:36:53 -0000 Hi lists, What=B4s is the current state of FreeBSD running on Amazon EC2 ? Is this stable ? Looking at Colin's status page (http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/) looks like there=B4s no active development on that. Does someone running production workload with FreeBSD on EC2 ? I'm interested in running network (dns and http with accept filter) and memory/buffer cache intensive applications on m1.small, m1.large and m2.xlarge instances. Any thoughts ? (I had posted this message to -question list, sorry for whom already received this) Best Regards and Happy New Year ! Alexandre