From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 1 10:41:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA14993 for current-outgoing; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 10:41:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA14988 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 10:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0u3oXd-0003xgC; Mon, 1 Apr 96 10:41 PST Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA00519; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 18:41:22 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: J Wunsch cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: FreeBSD performance vs BSD/OS In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Apr 1996 19:19:58 +0200." <199604011719.TAA06115@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 18:41:21 +0000 Message-ID: <517.828384081@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I don't like section 9. > > It's far better than no chance to document the kernel at all. We need > more people who start documenting the interfaces once they know. YES! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.