Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:07:04 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 272616] [panic] Reproducible kernel panic related to sendfile and IPSec Message-ID: <bug-272616-7501-oiwi6bSaNl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-272616-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-272616-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D272616 Aleksandr Fedorov <afedorov@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |afedorov@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #14 from Aleksandr Fedorov <afedorov@FreeBSD.org> --- The main problem is that we don=E2=80=99t know where the mbuf will fly from= with the M_EXTPG flag. Now it's an IPSEC, tomorrow something else. I think all funct= ions that work with mbuf's should correctly handle unmapped mbuf's. But as a temporary patch, the solution proposed by kib@ is quite suitable. And m_unshare() should handle unmapped mbuf's correctly. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-272616-7501-oiwi6bSaNl>