From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 11:56:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CA6106567A for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB358FC16 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so2051991wyi.13 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:56:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=VX+TK/RXPPmn4qDDz/C8fJFbkUq9dsvjuydP0U8XEoQ=; b=UQi/+SDP0SaAhnRoFS3PbHP3A+6C14PdL08Ccq1LvQEtSS1EDzejomGr8hzYAdi+dT L33x/b87Bpi3XFJSCNt9K1I9SGcysXwWwNKsQrJSzdHpBQqXZ8dzsC8jbLeqna/W6Onc 5rylBvglq713OqgyuM/YXwYtEijfE0fTTSmdQ= Received: by 10.227.58.15 with SMTP id e15mr9418150wbh.10.1319628430670; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:27:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.136.6 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:26:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Christer Solskogen Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:26:49 +0200 Message-ID: To: Peter Kryszkiewicz , freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: rsync and the ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:56:15 -0000 On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Peter Kryszkiewicz wrote: > Thanks. I suppose there's some way to get cvsup to fetch diffs and so on > across a bridge, from local net to the internet (the laptop has a wireless > card as well as a nic) but I spent a day trying to get bridging to work and > wasn't successful. SO I'm happy to stick to the simpler rsync way. > > By the way, since I'm new to this forum, does one indicate in the thread > somehow that the problem adressed by my previous message is fixed now? Do I > need to do that? If not, then cheers, mate, and thanks again for your help! I usually just post a message saying the problem is solved. Nothing else is "required". But it's also good practice to send a copy to the mailinglist (reply to all) - like I've done now. -- chs,