From owner-cvs-ports  Sun Jul  6 23:14:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA27166
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 23:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (ppp-206-170-32-212.snfc21.pacbell.net [206.170.32.212])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA27161;
          Sun, 6 Jul 1997 23:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shockwave.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA07638; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 23:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199707070608.XAA07638@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/tk41 Makefile ports/x11/tk41/files Makefile.lib md5 ports/x11/tk41/patches patch-ab patch-ac patch 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jul 1997 14:31:34 +0930."
             <199707070501.OAA28579@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> 
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 23:08:02 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


  From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
  Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/tk41 Makefile ports/x11/tk41/files        
>> Makefile.lib md5 ports/x11/tk41/patches patch-ab patch-ac patch
  Paul Traina stands accused of saying:
  > pst         1997/07/06 21:51:24 PDT
  > 
  >   Modified files:
  >     x11/tk41             Makefile 
  >     x11/tk41/files       Makefile.lib md5 
  >     x11/tk41/patches     patch-ab patch-ac 
  >   Added files:
  >     x11/tk41/scripts     post-patch 
  >   Removed files:
  >     x11/tk41/patches     patch-aa 
  >   Log:
  >   Upgrade to tk4.1p1 and use tcl7.5 port.
  
  Is there intelligence in this somewhere that will detect that the system
  is one with tcl7.5 as part of the base and not insist on the tcl7.5
  port being installed?

Nope, but that's a good idea for someone to implement.
  
  I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to achieve here; could you 
  perhaps expand on your motives?

Restoring tcl to port status, so that it may be upgraded or downgraded
more flexibly.  The tcl in FreeBSD is ancient.