From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 05:25:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5B416A41F for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 05:25:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from S2.cableone.net (s2.cableone.net [24.116.0.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AF844055 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 05:14:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (unverified [24.119.122.41]) by S2.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S2) with ESMTP id 29299723 for multiple; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 23:18:21 -0700 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 00:19:46 -0500 From: "Z.C.B." To: jesse Message-ID: <20050905001946.65459fcb@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <431B80F0.8060909@gmail.com> References: <431B80F0.8060909@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 109, in=162, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.122.41 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optimizing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 05:25:48 -0000 On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:19:12 -0500 jesse wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any performance gain when using Standard-PC HAL over > ACPI-PC HAL? I'm running FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE on a abit KR7A(KT266A) > motherboard. I currently have APIC disabled in the bios, ACPI > disabled at boot and I feel like my system is snappier. Just > wondering if there is any truth to this. I've not noticed any difference with ACPI on or off. I just leave it on so I have access to the features it provides. Make sure hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest is set to C1. In the area of APIC I remember finding some devices on my system not properly detecting with out it, on my Nforce2 board. No clue about that chipset. I've never any speed differences though.