From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Sep 24 16:59:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0E3A06A5C for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0C4D10BA for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so19773136igb.0 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:59:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=W5r/rW0hEFqwAJ73XmevU/8V7bfxSf/aE3bc2QhrvGg=; b=TkgesJOlK5tXog4Kscb0CdAE6JNkyP2LH7vx1P8eyYnRzYJ5wWGtQ7VLdGbveqF3k2 0Jhl78muUL65fv3C00K6Ew77GNjx3Yr0wmLgqybPwQSci7H/1KW0+YYIi16COczRM46G LMMBprkOeJTlAOGLq/Ky8tZoQ/kUPawAjJi6PQRvEzsU7RnNJozaXPC7N3RAnQ0itDRG rpX+isu+WRxFzTZipRSHtt7jw8lEf8tLLzTxWLA6c5uVeJT/N5DL1jPAPZPCP6wzqNCN IumxP+71/AsUmqOicrtMl5SCLLpRsr+C5oTi47nBRtgujMLqvYMXDEU/XYljdpGVrUmD Vbag== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVMRvXPKTQfTkXcmh2byQbzNDf/BZMckajAk1B8/2VLTjDNvbN2FxeYnG5JHsWMMin1O8Q MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.64.146 with SMTP id o18mr1709917igs.81.1443113980846; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: bsd-src@helfman.org Received: by 10.107.56.193 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:59:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150924073223.GA88752@dev.san.ru> References: <20150924073223.GA88752@dev.san.ru> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:59:40 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mB4Y5dIOJK8Pel0QLsCilUo94_Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: virtualization ports From: Jason Helfman To: Roman Bogorodskiy Cc: Jason Helfman , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:59:48 -0000 On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Jason Helfman wrote: > > > I have a number of ports that I maintain, that I really never use but at > > one time I did. Initially, I put them into the portstree to help out the > > community, with the idea that I would be using them one day, however I > work > > at a VMware shop, and the likelihood of me using this software is looking > > far less likely. I was wondering if it would be okay to assign these > ports > > to virtualization group? > > > > deskutils/virt-manager > > devel/libvirt > > devel/libvirt-glib > > devel/libvirt-java > > devel/py-libvirt > > devel/spice-protocol > > net-mgmt/virt-viewer > > FWIW, I could take care of libvirt, py-libvirt, libvirt-glib and > virt-manager. > > Roman Bogorodskiy > > Sounds good, thanks! Additionally, if you are going to take virt-manager, you really should take spice-protocol and virt-viewer as they are dependencies and require updates for virt-manager. Thoughts? -jgh -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power to Serve