Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:37:55 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 289333] [Feature Request] HFSC overhead calculation
Message-ID:  <bug-289333-7501-KBR4luikQW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-289333-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-289333-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D289333

--- Comment #3 from Oleksandr Kryvulia <o.kryvulia@flex-it.com.ua> ---
(In reply to Daniel Engel from comment #2)
> You think it is possible to insert a function after the HFSC output that
> simulates the effects of PPPoE encoding and pre-throttles the link the pa=
ckets=20
> egress on WAN?
Not exactly. IMHO, using two different shaping methods is not a good idea. I
mean something like that:

# Example simple pipe and queues for VOIP and low priority traffic:
kldload dummynet
dnctl pipe 1 config bw 700Kbit/s burst 1Mb
dnctl queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 10
dnctl queue 2 config pipe 1 weight 1

and coresponding pf rules:
pass out quick on $ext_if from $voip_clients to $voip_servers dnpipe(1)
pass out quick on $ext_if from any to any dnpipe(2)

Also may be a good point to use stateless rules for both incoming and outgo=
ing
VOIP traffic. In certain cases this will allow outgoing traffic to be queued
when media connection is initiated from wan side.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-289333-7501-KBR4luikQW>