Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:16:25 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com>
Cc:        Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, kde@freebsd.org, ruby@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, "Jason E. Hale" <bsdkaffee@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng
Message-ID:  <500C6DA9.1070305@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADLFttdWnm=V7CarqtnNr7=E4cSS=fX9bbXtJjbw6kT8g82Xfw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <D0056D18EAAD41119F26D0715FA52FB6@Rivendell> <15617903.FBMimp13fy@mocha.verizon.net> <CACdU%2Bf97xFgcdAA8UqAOZDk-kHsA2Y0qLDEr38r-MsPt6a-aOw@mail.gmail.com> <2193820.CL19acAFmS@mocha.verizon.net> <500B1953.10809@FreeBSD.org> <CADLFttc_zcWBMtR-SDCatqj77UOK%2BCKpBXKfn2RfKO99aJX2pg@mail.gmail.com> <500B8811.9090609@FreeBSD.org> <CADLFttdWnm=V7CarqtnNr7=E4cSS=fX9bbXtJjbw6kT8g82Xfw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/22/2012 07:51, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> You need to start to respect the people's work and plan, Doug. Also I
> am part of team that maintaining the bsd.gnome.mk. Yes it will be
> re-add if anyone plan to remove it, because I already have planned add
> the :build/:run feature in the bsd.gnome.mk that the without :* will
> be both build/run time dependency. It is impossible for me to not
> re-add it. It is not going to be long because I already have function
> :build/:run in the bsd.mate.mk (was repocopied from bsd.gnome.mk)
> available.
> 
> The only thing that I don't plan is to chase thousands of port to have
> the 'pkgconfig;build'. If anyone want to take up this task is cool
> with me.

So what you're saying is that in spite of the fact that the community
has identified a bug that it wants to fix, a bug which was added by the
team maintaining bsd.gnome.mk, that you are refusing to modify your
patch to handle the bug; but instead are demanding your right to
reintroduce the bug, and then further demanding the right to not fix it
after the patch is in? And furthermore, you're refusing to even look at
the other dependencies which are handled by bsd.gnome.mk to see if
similar bugs were introduced *by your team*, but you're happy to let
everyone else sort out the problems in thousands of ports for you.

And you want me to respect that?

-- 

    Change is hard.






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?500C6DA9.1070305>