From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 15 22: 1:37 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id A6BAC14F97; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:01:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBB31CD5D7; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:01:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:01:35 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/texts/alpha RELNOTES.TXT src/release/texts/i386 RELNOTES.TXT In-Reply-To: <200001160555.VAA90950@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Is there any compelling reason to maintain two versions of this file? The only differences between them seem to be due to bitrot (some i386-specific things have been added to i386, but a lot of the stuff in the alpha file is i386-only anyway). IMO we should just have the one file, and denote machdep stuff appropriately. Kris On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > kris 2000/01/15 21:55:35 PST > > Modified files: > release/texts/alpha RELNOTES.TXT > release/texts/i386 RELNOTES.TXT > Log: > Remove reference to floppy tape drive. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.21 +0 -2 src/release/texts/alpha/RELNOTES.TXT > 1.54 +0 -2 src/release/texts/i386/RELNOTES.TXT > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message