Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT) From: bmah@packetdesign.com (Bruce A. Mah) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/42134: linux-gtk PORTREVISION contaminates other ports Message-ID: <200208291630.g7TGU3oq004754@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/42134; it has been noted by GNATS. From: bmah@packetdesign.com (Bruce A. Mah) To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@packetdesign.com>, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/42134: linux-gtk PORTREVISION contaminates other ports Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:29:51 -0700 --==_Exmh_-1095512078P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Trevor Johnson wrote: > If, instead of including the linux-gtk Makefile, those other ports (and > linux-gtk itself) included some other Makefile without a PORTREVISION > line, then the problem would be solved, wouldn't it? The appropriate > place for such a Makefile would likely be in ports/Mk/ An excellent idea, but my ports-fu isn't good enough to do that. :-p The current behavior is pretty broken. I'd really like to see this fixed one way or another, either with my gross hack or with your much cleaner suggestion. > (calling it > bsd.redhat.mk could result in legal problems). Why? Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1095512078P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh on FreeBSD iD8DBQE9bkv/2MoxcVugUsMRAmJCAJ9sU5Eqk3WgizC/FEiQi2XIUGgStgCfUdAZ yBMQLHFKq2rOLBzCzV4b7jA= =8ph3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1095512078P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208291630.g7TGU3oq004754>