From owner-freebsd-security Fri Oct 26 2:58: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from internethelp.ru (wh.internethelp.ru [212.113.112.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C7D37B401 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 02:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from IBMKA (ibmka.internethelp.ru. [192.168.0.6]) by internethelp.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA09363; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:57:27 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:57:27 +0400 From: "Nickolay A.Kritsky" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) Personal Reply-To: "Nickolay A.Kritsky" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <978337558.20011026135727@internethelp.ru> To: Alexei Zakirov Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: ipfw and ipf on one box In-reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello Alexei, Friday, October 26, 2001, 12:46:35 PM, you wrote: AZ> On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Nickolay A.Kritsky wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Has anybody an experience of concurrent work of ipfw and ipfilter on >> one FreeBSD box? Is it possible? What will be the order of packets AZ> yes it's possible. I'm using this combination to get an in-kernel ipf NAT AZ> and ipfw working together. AZ> As I can see order is following: PKT ->> (ipnat) -> (ipfilter) -> (ipfw) -> (bpf) -> INTERFACE OUT AZ> PKT <- (ipfw) <- (ipf) <- (ipnat) <- (bpf) <- INTERFACE IN AZ> *** WBR, Alexei Zakirov (frank@unshadow.net) Thanks a lot, I will try this on my firewall. ;------------------------------------------- ; NKritsky ; SysAdmin InternetHelp.Ru ; http://www.internethelp.ru ; mailto:nkritsky@internethelp.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message