Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:05:29 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Cars <stefan@snowfall.se> To: Scott W <wegster@mindcore.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1 processor vs. 2 Message-ID: <20040303140216.U99563@guldivar.globalwire.se> In-Reply-To: <40452715.5030304@mindcore.net> References: <BC6A0533.1DC4C%joe@jwebmedia.com> <40452715.5030304@mindcore.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! Following up on this I'm also looking into buying some servers and have the almost the same scenario, a MySQL DB together with apache with mod_perl and embperl, (alot of SQL and dynamic content). Would we be better off with: Dual Xeon, 2.4 GHZ with 2GB of RAM or Xeon 3.0 GHZ with 2GB of RAM and RAID-1 on three disks or RAID-5 on three disks. Will the difference between 2.4 and 3.0 really do that much ? Isn't the SMP system better. Kind Regards, Stefan Cars On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Scott W wrote: > Joseph Koenig wrote: > > >I'm putting together a system that will host a relatively small database > >(around 20,000 records), as well as run Apache / PHP to search that > >database. I have the option in front of me to use a P III dual 1GHz machine > >with a SCSI Raid 5, or to use a single P4 2.8 GHz with a SCSI Raid 1. Both > >have 1GB RAM. I'm looking to use MySQL as the DB. The site that this machine > >will host gets about 2 million hits per months (yes, hits, not pageviews or > >visitors) from about 21,000 unique visitors. Does anyone have an opinion as > >to which machine will perform best under this scenario? Obviously, both > >would run FreeBSD. Thanks, > > > >Joe Koenig > >Production Manager > >jWeb New Media Design > >joe@jWebmedia.com > >http://www.jwebmedia.com/ > >636.928.3162 > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > Someone else already mentioned this, but RAID-1 will be faster than the > RAID-5 at the storage level, if the RAID-5 array is a relatively small # > of drives. If you're talking about 2 disk RAID-1 versus 10 disks > RAID-5, those numbers may change. If the drives are integrated into the > systems, it's also possible the RAID-1 disks are faster drives than the > RAID-5 drives... > > If you're going to run the DB and web server on the same system with a > high percentage of static pages, the SMP system may help out. > > If you have almost all dynamic content is full of complex DB queries, > the P4 would do better based solely on CPU speed. > > How about RAID-1 on the dual PIII and keep the P4 as a workstation? :-) > > The PIII is likely up to the task, but it really depends on the type of > content (is _everything_ PHP generating dynamic content, every page > hitting the DB etc?) > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Stefan Cars Snowfall Communications Tel: +46 (0)18 430 80 50 - Direct: +46 (0)18 430 80 51 Mobile: +46 (0)708 44 36 00 - Fax: +46 (0)708 44 36 04 ______________________________________________________________________ SNOWFALL DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this email and in any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this email for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its content to any other person. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Snowfall Communications. Snowfall Communications monitors the content of emails sent and received via its network for unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes. The contents of an attachment to this email may contain viruses which could damage your computer system. While Snowfall Communications has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the attachment.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040303140216.U99563>