From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 19 10:22: 2 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082CB37B400; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 10:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0JILr512586; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:21:53 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:21:53 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: mark@grondar.za, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: For all who miss it, PAM changes explanation reposted Message-ID: <20020119182153.GM11604@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200201190901.g0J91H641020@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020119170316.GA11315@nagual.pp.ru> <20020119172829.GB11604@nagual.pp.ru> <20020119173633.GD11604@nagual.pp.ru> <20020119174339.GG11604@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 18:48:03 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > > We *ALL* agree that old OPIE scheme with fake promts, in the way it was > > implemented, is not improves security. Everybody can detect it trying two > > times. > > Now that you've removed it, they don't even need to try twice. How is > that an improvement? 1) Improvement is that Problems removed (I post big message explaining Problems with fake prompts). Should I resent Problems message too? It seems unclear for someone (markm) but 2) Fake prompts is not related to 3-state pam_opie commit, this change is separate one. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message