From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon Aug  7  0:48:15 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0546837B9D2; Mon,  7 Aug 2000 00:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 13Lhdn-0001UH-00; Mon, 07 Aug 2000 09:48:07 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ln -i ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:45:20 -0400."
             <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008061242130.34851-100000@green.dyndns.org> 
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 09:48:07 +0200
Message-ID: <5720.965634487@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 12:45:20 -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:

> Anyway, it makes sense that if rm/mv/cp have -i and -v, ln should, too.

I think that it makes sense.

However, please make sure that the special case for link(1) does _not_
take the -i flag.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message