From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 13:44:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C5916A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@mavhome.dp.ua) Received: from cmail.optima.ua (cmail.optima.ua [195.248.191.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA2243D1D for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mav@mavhome.dp.ua) X-Spam-Level: 64 [XX] (100%) BAYESIAN TRAINING: 100 Received: from [212.86.226.11] (account mav@alkar.net [212.86.226.11] verified) by cmail.optima.ua (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.11) with ESMTPA id 19021514 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:43:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4582A692.1010302@mavhome.dp.ua> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:43:46 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051108 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: MPPC compression implementations legal status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:44:12 -0000 Hi. Can anybody explain me for sure current license status of Microsoft Point-to-Point Compression (MPPC) Protocol? It is not implemented in FreeBSD for years and I think it would be good to change this. In RFC 2118 told that "Source and object licenses are available on a non-discriminatory basis from Stac Electronics". Does it means requirement to get license to use HIFN implementation of this protocol or also denies any other free implementation? How does it coexist with Microsoft's "ROYALTY FREE PROTOCOL LICENSE AGREEMENT", http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms818807.aspx. Doesn't this agreement allows free implementation of server side protocols for cooperation with Windows client systems? -- Alexander Motin