From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 17:18:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD2116A494; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640FB43D49; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:18:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CE246BEA; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:18:21 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20060621170045.GB15163@soaustin.net> Message-ID: <20060621181745.S35462@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060619115827.A25435@wonkity.com> <20060621155727.E8526@fledge.watson.org> <20060621170045.GB15163@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: gnn@freebsd.org, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creation of a new list for Embedded.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:18:29 -0000 On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Mark Linimon wrote: > well, the question is, do discussions about picobsd, nanobsd, etc., which > may not be intended for what I would consider "embedded systems", move over > as well? > > If so, IMHO there ought to be one list. I can see arguments for either > choice. I think centralizing discussions on this one list make sense also, at least until such time as it's clear there's enough traffic to justify breaking it out. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge