From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 16:20:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C57916A431 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144CA43D55 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:20:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jANGKMLe070051 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jANGKMN5070050; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:20:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:20:22 GMT Message-Id: <200511231620.jANGKMN5070050@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Pav Lucistnik Cc: Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pav Lucistnik List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:20:24 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/89415; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, vd@datamax.bg Cc: Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:10:33 +0100 How does this cope with the maintainer approvals? Lot of those ports are owned by someone. I don't think there's a general clearance to bypass maintainers on this change. -- Pav Lucistnik I cannot be responsible for future messages as apparently my cats have learned to type.