From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 20 8:45:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E0A37B409 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from analog.databits.net (analog.databits.net [198.78.65.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1645143F13 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:45:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from petef@analog.databits.net) Received: (qmail 60277 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Jan 2003 16:41:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:41:57 -0600 From: Pete Fritchman To: Simon 'corecode' Schubert Cc: Ulrich Spoerlein , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Ports using SSL & ipv6 by default (was: Re: ports/47257: [update port] irc/ezbounce) Message-ID: <20030120164157.GC9751@absolutbsd.org> References: <200301201501.h0KF18Ko079987@coyote.dnsalias.net> <20030120171017.013346b9.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030120171017.013346b9.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ++ 20/01/03 17:10 +0100 - Simon 'corecode' Schubert: | how about defaulting to SSL? this is a generic question, not only | specific to this port. i'd vote for default-ssl and default-ipv6 because | both are well supported in the base system. | porters, portmgr, comments? I like it, I don't see why not (since, like you said, SSL and ipv6 are both in the base system). If people don't want them, they can always just add the appropriate WITHOUT_* knobs to make.conf. --pete To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message