From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Sun Mar 6 20:04:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FC0AC1409 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71DE6CA for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.104]) by resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id Sk2p1s00C2Fh1PH01k3yYL; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:03:59 +0000 Received: from www.cyberbotx.com ([68.37.67.123]) by resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id Sk3x1s00K2fa3tg01k3yrB; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:03:58 +0000 Received: from 192.168.2.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user cyberbotx) by www.cyberbotx.com with HTTP; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 15:03:58 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160306150134.3fa7a0b4@Papi> References: <000001d17672$14412ce0$3cc386a0$@quicknet.nl> <20160305120126.078559e3@Papi> <20160306150134.3fa7a0b4@Papi> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 15:03:58 -0500 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: phpvirtualbox-4.3.2 & virtualbox-ose-4.3.36 From: "Naram Qashat" To: "Mario Lobo" Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1457294639; bh=EThL3056WZVLNNKfVcm0AoxlbCvepR6JUK/aa/5WNLk=; h=Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pBKoshnGr8pMx8x2un4N42sYCKKfqWoVOsG9rRkG9LcpGH7vVVShf8leAhD8FWf/X Dix8Rupv/5ClKAclcr70/3n6Tis3jgHB/mHRBZzNYm57wf6c4Gb/knWd0ENc0WD/cl 91eoH3fQFQb47x5vMg9pBqy+BKnpFtLiWTetofMAw1B+lHjhhoymF4JeMmXRzZP7l5 AhOEfhqFB9M4+iIst68+euilkIrIKke0l8j+iFpko4fRYnlv+S1Jq6xnaUBmHhNG3w rRejVSXopH4poLI14GI3alXAw+iyykiKlVR3Ukf1S0mvqt6YdYV58auqXsrHCHH/I2 7n/5zvI4CG71w== X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:04:01 -0000 > On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 20:47:00 +0100 > Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > >> Am 05.03.2016 3:56 nachm. schrieb "Mario Lobo" : >> > >> > On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 12:26:42 +0100 >> > Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: >> > >> > > Am 05.03.2016 1:01 vorm. schrieb "Michael" : >> > > > >> > > > Hi all, >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I write this as I like to request a major upgrade for virtualbox >> > > > related ports on freebsd. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Currently I face problems using the current ports with php70 >> > > > port >> > > compiled. >> > > > >> > > > I don't want to go back to port php56. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Those problems can easy be fixed when phpvirtualbox-4.3.2 gets >> > > > an upgrade >> > > to >> > > > phpvirtualbox-5.0-5 >> > > > >> > > > as it now support php7 out of the box. >> > > > >> > > > Please have a look: >> > > > https://github.com/imoore76/phpvirtualbox/blob/develop/CHANGELOG.txt >> > > > Changelog. >> > > > >> > > > But before upgrading, the new Virtualbox version must be >> > > > upgraded also see https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Please can those ports be upgraded by someone for support of >> > > > systems >> > > running >> > > > PHP 7? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Category www >> > > > >> > > > -------------------- >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > phpvirtualbox-4.3.2 needs an upgrade for support of php 7 and >> > > > phpvirtualbox-5.0-5 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Category emulators >> > > > >> > > > -------------------------- >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > virtualbox-ose-4.3.36 needs an upgrade for support of php 7 and >> > > > phpvirtualbox-5.0-5 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > virtualbox-ose-additions-4.3.36 needs an upgrade for support of >> > > > php 7 and phpvirtualbox-5.0-5 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.3.36 needs an upgrade for support of php >> > > > 7 and phpvirtualbox-5.0-5 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Thank you for all the work! >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > With best regards, >> > > > >> > > > Michael >> > > >> > > Hi Michael, >> > > >> > > we know that we need to update vbox to 5.x but the sad truth is >> > > that we do not have a reasonable stable version of it. The port >> > > builds but the kernel module doesn't work properly so instead of >> > > breaking vbox for all people we will just stay at the last stable >> > > version that we have. phpvirtualbox is not backwards compatible >> > > so you have two options: >> > > >> > > 1) help on vbox 5.x port >> > > 2) create a phpvirtualbox patch for php7 >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list >> > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation >> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > > "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> > Pardon for barging in the thread but I've been running VBox 5.0.8 >> > with 4 VMs at my work since January without any problems (so far, >> > at least) >> > >> > [~]>pkg info | grep virtual >> > vde2-2.3.2_2 User-mode virtual ethernet >> > infrastructure virtualbox-ose-5.0.8 General-purpose full >> > virtualizer >> > >> > [~]>ps ax >> > PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >> > 944 - S 22:49.70 /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOMIPCD >> > 952 - S 66:11.24 /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSVC >> > 934 v0- I 3065:24.90 /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxHeadless >> > -startvm DBServer --vrde off 935 v0- I >> > 13068:32.29 /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxHeadless -startvm >> > WEBServer --vrde off 936 v0- I >> > 8552:00.08 /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxHeadless -startvm EXTServer >> > --vrde off >> > 15004 0- S 451:17.91 /usr/local/lib/virtualbox/VBoxHeadless >> > -startvm xDBServer --vrde off >> > >> > >> > On my desktop, I'm on V 5.0.14, also without any problems. >> > >> > It's a fact that the VMs at work are for development but they are >> > heavily used by the team. >> > >> > All FreeBSDs mentioned above are 10.2 STABLE. >> > >> > Of course, in all these cases, I adapted the port to compile and >> > test. >> > >> > When you say "the kernel module doesn't work properly", what >> > exactly do you mean? >> >> Then why don't you submit them as a PR? The version that I have >> tested and seen last time was an early 5.0 and that easily paniced >> kernels. Might be that this has been fixed in the meantime but let's >> find out. >> >> At least we could do a broader call for testers to get a better >> overview of where we are. > > Here are the versions I've experimenting successfully with: > > These are the modified port dirs. > > drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Sep 3 2015 5.0.2 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Sep 9 19:30 5.0.4 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Oct 2 21:05 5.0.6 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Oct 30 20:57 5.0.8 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Dec 1 10:02 5.0.10 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Dec 21 10:43 5.0.12 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Jan 30 10:23 5.0.14 > > > I've never submitted a PR before. Would you have any pointers on how > should I proceed with that? > > Thanks, > -- > Mario Lobo > http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br > FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] > > "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, > because that would also stop you from doing clever things." I've actually taken the 5.0.4 ports that Jung-uk Kim had created and made the fixes to them to make 5.0.16 compile with them. The only reason I have yet to submit the updated port is because virtualbox-ose-additions still doesn't compile and I haven't had a chance to fully fix that yet. I have no intention of taking over maintenance of the port, unless needed, but I do want to help get 5.x into the ports tree, so once I have all the ports compiling, I'll submit a PR to get the port updated. Thanks, Naram Qashat