From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 7 10:54:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA17133 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:54:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mails.ipri.kiev.ua ([195.5.13.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA17048 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:54:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnut@cki.ipri.kiev.ua) Received: from cki.ipri.kiev.ua ([195.5.13.69]) by mails.ipri.kiev.ua (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA28935 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:54:42 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <35CB3F8B.9EBF483F@cki.ipri.kiev.ua> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 20:55:24 +0300 From: "Oles' Hnatkevych" Organization: IPRI NAN of Ukraine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: All Subject: cacheable memory Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! since exist motherboards which chache memory up to a certain amount is there any 'hackers' kernel options to get use of this deficiency ;-). It's smarter to use uncacheable memory for disk IO cache and cacheable memory for code, IMHO ;-) Thank you. -- Best wishes, Oles Hnatkevych, http://gnut.kiev.ua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message