From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 19 15:38:26 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0070516A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:38:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi
	[195.197.172.115])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CD143D5D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:38:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pertti.kosunen@saunalahti.fi)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (KMDCLXI.dsl.saunalahti.fi [62.142.70.61])
	by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481D363108
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:38:24 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <417534EB.2020901@saunalahti.fi>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:38:19 +0300
From: Pertti Kosunen <pertti.kosunen@saunalahti.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird / FreeBSD
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:12:51 +0000
Subject: [Fwd: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:38:26 -0000

Kenneth Culver wrote:

> This is with a custom kernel with all debugging options off. I haven't 
> seen a
> mail from you yet that says whether you turned off debugging options 
> in the
> kernel or not, and if you haven't turned off debugging options, I'd 
> strongly
> suggest doing so. 


Isn't debugging options off by default on 5.3 betas?