From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jul 13 19:17:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA00498 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 19:17:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from geeklab.globalserve.net (geeklab.globalserve.net [209.90.144.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA00493 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 19:17:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from philipp@globalserve.net) Received: from localhost (philipp@localhost) by geeklab.globalserve.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA11875; Mon, 13 Jul 1998 22:39:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: geeklab.globalserve.net: philipp owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 22:39:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Philipp To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Jeremy Domingue , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Disgruntled Linux User... questions about FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <15927.900380269@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > In short, I simply do not agree with your suggestion that such boards > should be avoided and the FreeBSD Project would certainly lose several > very useful machines if we suddenly adopted that kind of hard-line > stance. In time I may change my stance, as support for built-in ethernet/scsi becomes more popular and give a variety of brands to select from. I'm glad that people do disagree with me, because then we would have no effort to improve things as they are developed. I'm certainly glad that you disagree with me jkh, this means that at least some of the FreeBSD project are looking into hardware such as this, and kernel development for the specific hardware. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message