Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 18:35:46 +0100 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Burke <alex@alexburke.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: vfs.zfs.compressed_arc_enabled=0 is INCOMPATIBLE with L2ARC at least in FreeBSD 13 (Was: Crash on adding L2ARC to raidz1 pool) Message-ID: <2757ebae-b543-47a3-9a77-b181a2e8bfd7@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <f20767e9-952c-45c3-81d7-96a5741b6cac@alexburke.ca> References: <22167ed4-887d-4fe0-b0a6-36312ae38fea@FreeBSD.org> <aabed885-79ed-4a2d-9304-c56282f2f631@FreeBSD.org> <f20767e9-952c-45c3-81d7-96a5741b6cac@alexburke.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13.01.2024 18:11, Alexander Burke wrote: > Hello, > > It looks like the issue is fixed in OpenZFS 2.2 (and thus in FreeBSD 14-RELEASE): > > https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15764#issuecomment-1890491789 It is my issue and my comment. GitHub's blacklion is me :) Problem is, such smoke tests can not prove absence of bugs. I prefer to see some comments from active OpenZFS developers, that something was fixed (or not). There is problem with "zfs send" when arc_compression_enabled=0, for example (see https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/discussions/15720). -- // Lev Serebryakov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2757ebae-b543-47a3-9a77-b181a2e8bfd7>