From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 10:43:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAA016A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:43:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8153043D1D for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:43:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) Received: from localhost.localdomain (12-230-74-101.client.attbi.com[12.230.74.101]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004010218430101200fo924e>; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 18:43:01 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i02IfHgS065088; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:41:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i02IfC5B065087; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:41:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) To: Darren Henderson References: <200401020747.i027lXj4008818@dyson.jdyson.com> From: underway@comcast.net (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:41:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Darren Henderson's message of "Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:13:03 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gratuitious controversy isn't a good thing!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 18:43:04 -0000 Darren Henderson writes: > pc gone wild.... Sad. It's as much about the perquisites of developers as about PC-ness. The peculiar tastes of some developers is tolerated as thanks for their work or at least to help keep them happy. Plus, there can be a kind of competition between them in who gets to put his own stamp on the software, without adverse imact on important software. Nothing to be sad about. Otherwise, I don't see why "fortunes" and other "games" are in the Baseline Software Distribution at all.