Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 21:31:53 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: clang tautology Message-ID: <4FC45139.70108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <m262bfsl5q.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <m2ehq3snv5.wl%randy@psg.com> <m262bfsl5q.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/28/2012 8:47 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > and if i try to follow http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang > i do not see where the clang world and kernel are actually made the > normal bootable. > > is the clang build for releng_9 for amd64 in good enough shape that i > can simply > csup > hack make.conf clean /usr/obj (I know you know this, but for the sake of the archive ....) > make buildworld > make kernel > boot single > make installworld > mergemaster -cviFU FYI, there is no reason to use -F and -U together. The latter is sufficient. The -F option is useful on a new install when the db for -U is not present. > reboot > > as if life was normal? Normal'ish. Personally, unless you have a specific reason to have a clang-built world, I would avoid the hassle. (Not to mention all the extra time that bootstrapping clang takes during buildworld.) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC45139.70108>