From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 10:09:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEAB16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from therub.org (pantheon-ws-13.direct.hickorytech.net [216.114.200.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A2D43D2F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from drue by therub.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B41xP-0004y8-00 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:09:27 -0600 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:09:27 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040318180927.GD18657@therub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Dan Rue Subject: Downgrading 4.9-stable to 4.9-release-p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:09:28 -0000 I upgraded some servers to 4.9-stable a few weeks ago, not realizing that I really wanted releng_4_9. Since I have to apply this openssl fix anyway, I thought I could go from 4.9-stable to releng_4_9 no problem. The alternative, as I see it, is to wait for 4.10 to come and upgrade to that. Am I going to run into problems going from 4.9-stable to releng_4_9? If I can sneak in a second question. With this openssl fix, couldn't I just apply the patch, cd /usr/src/crypto/openssl && make install ? Instead of the recommended buildworld fiasco? tia, dan