Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 05:52:46 +1000 From: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> To: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io, c.koehne@beckhoff.com Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>, FreeBSD Virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] OvmfPkg/BhyveBhfPkg: add support for QemuFwCfg Message-ID: <c6087bea-ed0e-ba94-4f58-ada1bf049ad2@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <dc7769bd-372c-8d57-c683-ad845359b318@bsdio.com> References: <20220329101417.617-1-c.koehne@beckhoff.com> <b799a8e3f6de41eca391124ae553deec@beckhoff.com> <dc7769bd-372c-8d57-c683-ad845359b318@bsdio.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [re-posting from my personal email account, since my mail to > freebsd-virtualization got rejected]> > I seem to remember seeing previous feedback that Bhyve developers > strongly preferred the BhyveFwCtl mechanism. I've been out of the loop > though (busy with $dayjob) so I don't know if things have changed. > Hopefully other people can provide feedback. I'm fine with phasing out BhyveFwCtl, so long as backwards compat is maintained. later, Peter.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c6087bea-ed0e-ba94-4f58-ada1bf049ad2>